Opinion

R. Neumann & Co. v. Overseas Shipments, Inc., Seton Leather Co. v. Overseas Shipments, Inc.

326 F.2d 786
51 C.C.P.A. 946

Court: Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Filed: Jan 23, 1964
Status: Published
Author: Worley
On the bench: Worley, Rich, Martin, Smith, Almond
Cited by: 11 cases

adoption of term “HYDE” instead of “HIDE” for “plastic material of leatherlike appearance made into shoes” does not mitigate deceptiveness

How later courts described this case

adoption of term “HYDE” instead of “HIDE” for “plastic material of leatherlike appearance made into shoes” does not mitigate deceptiveness

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

WORLEY, Chief Judge

(dissenting;.

I see no error in the board’s interpretation and application of the Lanham Act to the facts here. Accordingly, I would affirm.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.