concluding that Cuban refugees could not “obtain justice” from post- revolutionary Cuban courts such that the district court’s forum non conveniens dismissal in favor of those courts was inappropriate
How later courts described this case
- concluding that Cuban refugees could not “obtain justice” from post- revolutionary Cuban courts such that the district court’s forum non conveniens dismissal in favor of those courts was inappropriate
- placing burden on defendant to show that plaintiffs could “obtain justice in the courts of Cuba,” rather than “embarking] upon an international sea of judicial notice of the treatment of those who flee their native land and return to Castro’s jurisdiction.”
- holding that Fidel Castro’s Cuba was an inadequate alternative forum for a Cuban refugee
- finding that political refugees could receive a fair hearing in Cuba
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
CAMERON, Circuit Judge.
I concur in the result.