Opinion

Application of Claus L. Sporck

  • 301 F.2d 686
  • 49 C.C.P.A. 1039
Court
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Filed
May 4, 1962
Status
Published
Author
Martin
On the bench
Worley, Rich, Martin, Smith, Kirkpatrick
Cited by
26 cases

The opinion

MARTIN, Judge

(dissenting).

I disagree with the majority because I believe that one skilled in this art who wanted to manufacture a hollow generally conical-shaped article having a tapered side by means of the axial displacement procedure, would know that a tapered blank should be used and that the path of the roller should not be parallel to the spindle. I find nothing else in this application upon which patentability can be predicated.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.