Opinion

Application of Angelo E. Bartlett and Elwood J. Fletcher

300 F.2d 942
49 C.C.P.A. 969

Court: Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Filed: Apr 11, 1962
Status: Published
Author: Worley
On the bench: Worley, Rich, Martin, Smith, Kirkpatrick
Cited by: 10 cases
Authority: More cited than 24.7%

The opinion

WORLEY, Chief Judge,

dissenting.

I am in complete agreement with the examiner and board that there is nothing here of a patentable nature. Indeed, it is as devoid of patentability as the subject matter of In re Balmer, 276 F.2d 405 , 47 CCPA 883. My reasons there are equally applicable here.

To give appellant a monopoly will effectively prevent others in this field from exercising even the simplest kind of ordinary skill.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.