Opinion

United States v. Nicholas A. Stirone

  • 262 F.2d 571
  • 43 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2530
  • 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4965
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Filed
Jan 27, 1959
Status
Published
On the bench
Biggs, Goodrich, Hastie, Per Curiam, Staley
Cited by
108 cases

Reversed on other grounds by Stirone v. United States, 361 U.S. 212 (1960)

adopting the inclusionary statement of the rule against other crimes evidence

How later courts described this case

  • adopting the inclusionary statement of the rule against other crimes evidence

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

On Petition for Rehearing

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and Goodrich, McLAUGHLIN, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

A petition for rehearing is presented for our consideration. The grounds urged therein have been fully argued to this court. We find no merit therein that would warrant a rehearing. Accordingly it will be denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.