The Central Railroad Company of New Jersey v. Jules S. Sottnek Co., Inc., Sottnek Terminal Corporation, and Third Party New York Dock Company

CLARK, Chief Judge

(concurring in-the result).

I concur in the affirmance and in the-opinion herewith except for the dictum, that the New York City Fire Marshal’s-report was not admissible in evidence.. We need not decide that here; if pressed: to a decision I should hold it admissible, the objections going to its weight, rather than its admissibility. Pekelis v. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc., *89 2 Cir., 187 F.2d 122 , 23 A.L.R.2d 1349 , certiorari denied Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc., v. Pekelis, 341 U.S. 951 , 71 S.Ct. 1020 , 95 L.Ed. 1374 ; Korte v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., 2 Cir., 191 F.2d 86 , certiorari denied New York, N. H. & H. R. Co. v. Korte, 342 U.S. 868 , 72 S.Ct. 108 , 96 L.Ed. 652 .