The opinion
CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge
(concurring).
It is apparent to me that the trial judge who saw and heard Stain on the witness stand concluded from Stain’s testimony that Stain’s claim of conscientious objection and inability to under *344 stand the selective service proceedings was a sham. In this, the trial judge should have every intendment. However, under the particular circumstances here, I concur that the local board did not give the defendant due process.