summarizing our domestic violence custody cases and remanding for superior court to consider whether single severe choking incident amounted to a history of domestic violence under AS 25.24.150(b
How later courts described this case
- summarizing our domestic violence custody cases and remanding for superior court to consider whether single severe choking incident amounted to a history of domestic violence under AS 25.24.150(b
- remanding case "where the necessary findings are lacking on appeal"
- findings adequate if sufficiently comprehensive to provide a basis for decision and supported by the evidence
- findings of fact required
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge
(concurring).
It seems to me that the probability here is that the trial judge did not think he could rely on the testimony of Donald Hubbard. I cannot agree to an outright reversal of the case. I might be inclined to affirm the judgment as rendered if I had support from my colleagues. Under the circumstances, believing that Judge WIIG’S solution is a reasonable one, I concur with him. Apparently all three of us have the same view of the California rules of negligence affecting this case.