Opinion

Kilgore Nat. Bank v. Federal Petroleum Board

  • 209 F.2d 557
  • 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4270
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Jan 15, 1954
Status
Published
Author
Hutcheson
On the bench
Hutcheson, Holmes, Russell
Cited by
9 cases

The opinion

HUTCHESON, Chief Judge

(concurring specially).

I concur in the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed and in the reasons given therefor. I think though that our mandate should show that the affirmance of the judgment is without prejudice to the right of the appellant, conferred by the subpoena itself in the last clause, to make timely objection to and to have excluded from the record in the inquiry all checks or other documents which are irrelevant to the inquiry. I am of the opinion that this is the effect of the judgment below and of our affirmance of it. I think, though, that our opinion or our mandate should make this clear.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.