Opinion

Robert Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners Conference

  • 202 F.2d 312
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Oct 20, 1952
Status
Published
On the bench
Miller, Proctor, Bazelon
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 97.5%

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

The urgency of a speedy determination of' this controversy is recognized by all parties concerned and accounts for the immediate hearing and consideration of the case by this court.

It is the conclusion of the majority that the judgment of the District Court should be affirmed. Their views are in substantial accord with those of Chief Judge Laws of the District Court set forth in his opinion, 104 F.Supp. 734 .

Affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.