Opinion

Reynolds v. Lovett, Secretary of National Defense

  • 201 F.2d 181
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Apr 6, 1953
Status
Published
Author
Prettyman
On the bench
Clark, Prettyman, Proctor
Cited by
12 cases
Authority
More cited than 92.7%

The opinion

PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.

This case concerns the rights of civilian Government employees having veterans’ preferences. Appellants were honorably discharged soldiers, employed at the Mare Island Naval Shipyard, and their records were rated good or better. A reduction in the number of employees at the Shipyard was made. Appellants were reduced in their positions and grades, while non-veterans in the same classifications were retained in their positions and grades. Appellee officials say that appellants were demoted because, in the judgment of the officers in charge of the Shipyard, they were not qualified for the supervisory nucleus, composed of the best craftsmen, each one carefully selected on the basis of his individual qualifications. They say that the non-veterans were deemed by them better qualified for supervisory positions than were the appellants. We think that appellees’ view that when personnel is reduced the head of an agency may select employees to be retained in any classification on the basis of individual merit and without giving effect to Section 12 of the Veterans’ Preference Act 1 is erroneous.

The case is reversed and remanded for action in accordance with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

. 58 Stat. 390 (1944), as amended, 5 U.S.C.A. § 861 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.