Opinion

Aktiebolaget Bofors v. United States (Two Cases). Aktiebolaget Bofors v. Acheson, Secretary of State

  • 194 F.2d 145
  • 90 U.S. App. D.C. 92
  • 91 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 285
  • 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3634
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Nov 29, 1951
Status
Published
Author
Fahy
On the bench
Clark, Fahy, Miller, Wilbur
Cited by
43 cases

no action may be entertained for declaratory judgment adjudicating that defendant is guilty of tort

How later courts described this case

  • no action may be entertained for declaratory judgment adjudicating that defendant is guilty of tort
  • The “label which a plaintiff applies to a pleading does not determine the nature of the cause of action which he states.”
  • amount in contract suit exceeded $10,-000

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

FAHY, Circuit Judge.

I concur in the result. In No. 10870, however, I think we should leave to the court having jurisdiction of the contract issue the question whether or not a cause of action for breach of contract is stated.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.