Opinion

In Re Samuel R. PIERCE, Jr. (Kisner Fee Application)

  • 178 F.3d 1356
  • 336 U.S. App. D.C. 309
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 14167
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Jun 22, 1999
Status
Published
Author
Cudahy
On the bench
Sentelle, Fay, Cudahy
Cited by
36 cases

The opinion

CUDAHY, Senior Circuit Judge,

concurring in the judgment:

The result here is dictated by the extensive Special Division precedent establishing an extraordinarily demanding test for eligibility for attorneys’ fees. Whether Congress originally intended that the bar for eligibility be set this high is to me unclear. But we are not writing on a clean slate.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.