Opinion

Boles Et Al. v. Chavis

  • 454 U.S. 907
  • 50 U.S.L.W. 3273
  • 102 S. Ct. 415
  • 70 L. Ed. 2d 225
  • 1981 U.S. LEXIS 4050
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Filed
Oct 13, 1981
Status
Published
On the bench
Rehnquist
Cited by
58 cases
Authority
More cited than 98.6%

In disciplinary proceedings, the failure of the committee to disclose to the inmate the investigatory report or the substance of that report containing statements by witnesses which excuplated the inmate denied the inmate due process.

How later courts described this case

  • In disciplinary proceedings, the failure of the committee to disclose to the inmate the investigatory report or the substance of that report containing statements by witnesses which excuplated the inmate denied the inmate due process.
  • pro forma statement of evidence relied on and reasons for guilt with no statement regarding credibility determinations does not fulfill Wolff's requirement of written statement of reasons and evidence
  • committee report which stated it recognized and considered inmate's statement, but accepted the reporting officer's charges, found inadequate
  • defendants must plead and prove good faith before they are entitled to qualified immunity in a § 1983 action

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.