Opinion

United States v. Curry

  • 47 U.S. 106
  • 6 How. 106
  • 12 L. Ed. 363
  • 1848 U.S. LEXIS 302
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Filed
Mar 18, 1848
Status
Published
Author
Woodbury
On the bench
Taney, Woodbury
Cited by
77 cases

‘“[A]s this appeal has not been prosecuted in the manner directed, within the time limited by the acts of Congress, it must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction”

How later courts described this case

  • ‘“[A]s this appeal has not been prosecuted in the manner directed, within the time limited by the acts of Congress, it must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction”
  • "No attorney or solicitor can withdraw his name, after he has once entered it on the record, without the leave of the court."

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Mr. Justice WOODBURY

dissented:

*114

Order.

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the District Court of the United States for the District of Louisiana, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, and it appearing to the court that this appeal has not been prosecuted .in the manner directed and within the time limited by the acts of Congress, it is therefore now here ordered and' decreed by this court, that this- appeal be and the same.is hereby dismissed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.