Opinion

Davis v. Chiles

  • 139 F.3d 1414
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 8339
  • 1998 WL 210571
Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Filed
Apr 30, 1998
Status
Published
Author
Fay
On the bench
Birch, Fay, Cohill
Cited by
35 cases

assigning “little probative value” to the post-trial appointment and reelection of a black judge in Florida’s Second Judicial Circuit, which includes Liberty County, and the “recent” election of a black judge who faced a white opponent in Leon County, Florida

How later courts described this case

  • assigning “little probative value” to the post-trial appointment and reelection of a black judge in Florida’s Second Judicial Circuit, which includes Liberty County, and the “recent” election of a black judge who faced a white opponent in Leon County, Florida
  • noting in footnote 14 that “[o]ur en banc court established this principle as part of our Section Two jurisprudence in our interpretation of the first Gingles factor in Nipper"
  • holding that the “Miller and Gingles lines [of cases] address very different contexts”
  • noting that while analysis of white-white elections is relevant, evidence from black-white elections is more probative

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

FAY, Senior Circuit Judge,

concurring specially:

I concur in sections I, IIA, 1 throiigh 4, of the opinion for the court. It seems to me that Section IIB is simply unnecessary and therefore dicta with which I disagree but find no need to discuss. I do concur in footnote 22.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.