Opinion

McDougall v. North Carolina

  • 464 U.S. 865
  • 52 U.S.L.W. 3266
  • 104 S. Ct. 197
  • 78 L. Ed. 2d 173
  • 1983 U.S. LEXIS 1724
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Filed
Oct 3, 1983
Status
Published
On the bench
Brennan, Marshall
Cited by
816 cases
Authority
More cited than 99.8%

recognizing that "the exercise of discretion ... will be judged by the amount of time the jury deliberates in light of the nature of the case and the evidence"

How later courts described this case

  • recognizing that "the exercise of discretion ... will be judged by the amount of time the jury deliberates in light of the nature of the case and the evidence"
  • affirming trial court's capacity determination made in off-the-record conference with parties without conducting contradictory hearing
  • regarding "presumption of regularity”, i.e., state courts presumably follow their own law and procedures
  • first-degree felony murder conviction and death sentence upheld even though the jury found that the defendant was under the influence of mental or emotional disturbance when he committed the murder and that the defendant’s capacity to appreciate the criminality of his conduct or to conform to the requirements of law was impaired

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Sup. Ct. N. C.;

Sup. Ct. Ark.;

Sup. Ct. Fla.;

Sup. Ct. Ark.;

Sup. Ct. Del.;

Sup. Ct. Ga.;

Sup. Ct. Fla.;

Sup. Ct. Ariz.;

Sup. Ct. Ill.;

Sup. Ct. Ill.;

C. A. 5th Cir.;

Sup. Ct. Ala.;

Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;

C. A. 11th Cir.;

Sup. Ct. Miss.;

Sup. Ct. Fla.;

Sup. Ct. La.;

Sup. Ct. Va.;

Sup. Ct. N. C.;

Sup. Ct. Ga.;

Sup. Ct. Fla.;

Ct. Crim. App. Okla.; and Sup. Ct. Ariz. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 82-2105, 308 N. C. 1 , 301 S. E. 2d 308 ; No. 82-6697, 278 Ark. 305 , 645 S. W. 2d 680 ; No. 82-6733, 428 So. 2d 649 ; No. 82-6741, 278 Ark. 211 , 645 S. W. 2d 662 ; No. 82-6771, 490 A. 2d 104 ; No. 82-6852, 250 Ga. 630 , 300 S. E. 2d 640 ; No. 82-6865, 426 So. 2d 533 ; No. 82-6870, 135 Ariz. 404 , 661 P. 2d 1105 ; No. 82-6876, 94 Ill. 2d 437 , 447 N. E. 2d 247 ; No. 82-6881, 94 Ill. 2d 378 , 447 N. E. 2d 218 ; No. 82-6915, 696 F. 2d 1154 and 705 F. 2d 121 ; No. 82-6916, 431 So. 2d 563 ; No. 82-6922, 658 S. W. 2d 162 ; No. 82-6923, 696 F. 2d 804 ; No. 82-6933, 431 So. 2d 1101 ; No. 82-6937, 429 So. 2d 293 ; No. 82-6982, 426 So. 2d 118 ; No. 82-6990, 225 Va. 289 , 302 S. E. 2d 520 ; No. 83-5051, *866 308 N. C. 47 , 301 S. E. 2d 335 ; No. 83-5095, 251 Ga. 113 , 303 S. E. 2d 266 ; No. 83-5145, 429 So. 2d 287 ; No. 83-5183, 665 P. 2d 1186 ; No. 83-5227, 136 Ariz. 250 , 665 P. 2d 972 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.