Opinion

Zoning Board of Adjustment v. DeBlasio

  • 516 U.S. 937
  • 64 U.S.L.W. 3286
  • 116 S. Ct. 352
  • 133 L. Ed. 2d 247
  • 1995 U.S. LEXIS 7112
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Filed
Oct 16, 1995
Status
Published
Cited by
52 cases
Authority
More cited than 91.7%

concluding that "[n]o 'new evidence' resulted from the jurors' use of a magnifying glass to examine ... fingerprint cards and [a] gun"

How later courts described this case

  • concluding that "[n]o 'new evidence' resulted from the jurors' use of a magnifying glass to examine ... fingerprint cards and [a] gun"
  • “[e]ven where the right to self-representation is clearly invoked, it must be done so in a timely manner, and courts will balance any such assertion against considerations of judicial delay”
  • "[W]hen a state affords a full judicial mechanism with which to challenge the administrative decision in question, the state provides adequate procedural due process, ... whether or not the plaintiff avails himself or herself of the provided appeal mechanism."
  • allegations of partisan political purposes for a zoning decision state a claim

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of New Jersey State League of Municipalities for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.