defendant need not show speech actually interfered with workings of office, but only that it reasonably threatened to do so
How later courts described this case
- defendant need not show speech actually interfered with workings of office, but only that it reasonably threatened to do so
- noting presumption against removal jurisdiction
- “The amount in controversy is ordinarily determined by the allegations of the complaint.”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
This record has no opinion text. It is a disposition such as a denial of certiorari, kept so the case can be found by name and citation.