finding that sole shareholder, director, officer and employee of a corporation issued a subpoena duces tecum held no Fifth Amendment privilege, and explaining that he “chose the corporate form and gained its attendant benefits ... he cannot now disregard the corporate form to shield his business records from production”
How later courts described this case
- finding that sole shareholder, director, officer and employee of a corporation issued a subpoena duces tecum held no Fifth Amendment privilege, and explaining that he “chose the corporate form and gained its attendant benefits ... he cannot now disregard the corporate form to shield his business records from production”
- “Decisions whether to engage in cross-examination, and if so to what extent and in what manner, are ... strategic in nature.”
- Napoli, Relia, Weinstein and Fishman
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
This record has no opinion text. It is a disposition such as a denial of certiorari, kept so the case can be found by name and citation.