finding it "illogical and contrary to the interests of judicial economy" that this court could not directly hold that "a constitutional right allegedly violated could not have been clearly established because it has not been recognized"
How later courts described this case
- finding it "illogical and contrary to the interests of judicial economy" that this court could not directly hold that "a constitutional right allegedly violated could not have been clearly established because it has not been recognized"
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
This record has no opinion text. It is a disposition such as a denial of certiorari, kept so the case can be found by name and citation.