where statements accusing plaintiff of 'theft took place either during the investigation mandated by the collective bargaining agreement or during formal or informal disciplinary hearings, plaintiff’s subsequent action for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress was preempted by the RLA
How later courts described this case
- where statements accusing plaintiff of 'theft took place either during the investigation mandated by the collective bargaining agreement or during formal or informal disciplinary hearings, plaintiff’s subsequent action for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress was preempted by the RLA
- district court retains jurisdiction for Rule 11 sanctions after notice of appeal is filed
- a political subdivision’s capacity to sue is determined by state law
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
This record has no opinion text. It is a disposition such as a denial of certiorari, kept so the case can be found by name and citation.