Georgia statute had no “scheme that requires release ‘unless adverse findings based on [specific] criteria are made’ ” thus there was no protected liberty interest.
How later courts described this case
- Georgia statute had no “scheme that requires release ‘unless adverse findings based on [specific] criteria are made’ ” thus there was no protected liberty interest.
- plea of no contest does not preclude a defendant from claiming the statute under which he pleaded is unconstitutional
- parole board’s refusal to allow inmate to examine his file does not constitute a constitutional violation
- previous Georgia parole system did not create liberty interest
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
This record has no opinion text. It is a disposition such as a denial of certiorari, kept so the case can be found by name and citation.