after the court denied the defendant’s motion to exclude testimony of his former wife, he argued that her “testimony was given because of a desire for revenge arising out of certain unrelated events;” the appellate court found no error in the trial court’s decision to allow the testimony
How later courts described this case
- after the court denied the defendant’s motion to exclude testimony of his former wife, he argued that her “testimony was given because of a desire for revenge arising out of certain unrelated events;” the appellate court found no error in the trial court’s decision to allow the testimony
- the Court scrutinizes and weighs, in light of Mosley, all the facts surrounding the second interrogation
- the defendant unequivocally refused to make a statement
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
This record has no opinion text. It is a disposition such as a denial of certiorari, kept so the case can be found by name and citation.