Opinion

Feist v. Luzerne County Board of Assessment Appeals

  • 429 U.S. 1097
  • 97 S. Ct. 1115
  • 51 L. Ed. 2d 545
  • 1977 U.S. LEXIS 712
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Filed
Feb 22, 1977
Status
Published
Cited by
125 cases
Authority
More cited than 98.0%

noting that American citizenship of at least some of the stockholders of the shipowner has been held sufficient in and of itself to support jurisdiction under the Jones Act

How later courts described this case

  • noting that American citizenship of at least some of the stockholders of the shipowner has been held sufficient in and of itself to support jurisdiction under the Jones Act
  • disallowing compensation inter alia for time spent pursuing "unsuccessful theories of liability"
  • “It is equally clear . . . that while longshoremen retain the right to recover damages against a vessel, in such an action they occupy the same position as their land-based counterparts.”
  • “[w]e do not suggest or imply that ... a price discount to ... wholesalers ... which has the purpose or effect of defeating the objectives of the Act” is beyond the scope of the Act

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

This record has no opinion text. It is a disposition such as a denial of certiorari, kept so the case can be found by name and citation.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.