Opinion

Barancik v. County of Marin

  • 872 F.2d 834
  • 1988 WL 66334
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Apr 19, 1989
Status
Published
Author
Schroeder
On the bench
Noonan, Scannlain, Schroeder
Cited by
7 cases

zoning ranch area to preserve rural landscape is not irrational merely because as many cows would graze on plaintiff's property if there were twenty-eight residences as would graze if there were nine

How later courts described this case

  • zoning ranch area to preserve rural landscape is not irrational merely because as many cows would graze on plaintiff's property if there were twenty-eight residences as would graze if there were nine

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge,

concurring specially:

I concur in the result. The district court properly dismissed appellant’s action. On the basis of the undisputed facts in the record, appellant could not prevail on any of his challenges to the county’s original zoning, or to the county’s rejection of plaintiff’s request to treble the density permitted under that zoning.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.