Opinion

Brown v. United States Postal Service

  • 860 F.2d 884
  • 1988 WL 111313
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Oct 26, 1988
Status
Published
Author
Goodwin
On the bench
Fletcher, Goodwin, King
Cited by
2 cases

alleged comment by juror to witness was harmless, inter alia, because it was “beneficial to [defendant] and detrimental to the government”

How later courts described this case

  • alleged comment by juror to witness was harmless, inter alia, because it was “beneficial to [defendant] and detrimental to the government”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

GOODWIN, Chief Judge,

dissenting:

I dissent from part C of the majority opinion. I realize that it is virtually impossible to fire a government employee. However, a person who proves himself untrustworthy around the cash register is not, in my view, entitled to a management search for an alternative job in another part of the plant.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.