Opinion

Choctaw Manufacturing Co. v. United States

  • 761 F.2d 609
Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Filed
May 7, 1985
Status
Published
Author
Dumbauld
On the bench
Dumbauld, Tjoflat
Cited by
10 cases

The opinion

DUMBAULD, District Judge,

concurring:

It would seem that the contracting officer Melvyn Suplee exercised the same sort of common sense as often occurs when an “inferior” federal court delays deciding a case until another case involving the same issue, known to be pending in the Supreme Court, has been there decided and an authoritative determination of the issue obtained.

However, as well explained in Judge Tjo-flat’s thorough and convincing opinion, the procurement process requires speedy determination and clearcut rules. Otherwise the troops in need of shirts (or shoes or munitions or whatever) might be left destitute like Washington’s men at Valley Forge. Certainty rather than correctness is the controlling criterion. There will soon be other contracts to be awarded, and any change in the status of a contested bidder will apply to future awards.

Hence Rutter Rex (to whom Suplee awarded contracts Nos. 314 and 315) was ineligible to bid 1 at the time Suplee should *622 have awarded those contracts, and thñs he should have awarded them to plaintiff Choctaw.

I therefore join in the decision of the Court.

. And had not taken a timely appeal to review its status insofar as those contracts were concerned.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.