The opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6122
WILLIAM T. KEMPH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
W. F. BROWN, Detective; TOWN OF VINTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:12-cv-00430-GEC)
Submitted: May 30, 2013 Decided: June 5, 2013
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Timothy Kemph, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Timothy Kemph appeals the district court’s
orders dismissing without prejudice as legally frivolous his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, ∗ see 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b)(1),
1367(c) (2006), and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Kemph v. Brown, No. 7:12-cv-00430-GEC (W.D. Va. Nov. 8,
2012; Jan. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗
We conclude that the order is final and appealable as no
amendment to the complaint could cure the defects identified by
the district court. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers
Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).
2