Opinion

In re Abcor Development Corp.

  • 588 F.2d 811
  • 200 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 215
  • 1978 CCPA LEXIS 187
Court
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Filed
Dec 14, 1978
Status
Published
Author
Baldwin
On the bench
Baldwin, Miller, Rich
Cited by
149 cases

holding GASBADGE generic because evidence of the context in which a mark is used on package labels is probative of the reaction of prospective buyers

How later courts described this case

  • holding GASBADGE generic because evidence of the context in which a mark is used on package labels is probative of the reaction of prospective buyers
  • affirming the board’s finding that “GAS-BADGE” is merely descriptive of a badge which detects gaseous pollutants
  • “Evidence of the context in which a mark is used on labels, packages, or in advertising material directed to the goods is probative of the reaction of prospective purchasers to the mark.”
  • GASBADGE at least descriptive for gas monitoring badges; 7 Ser. No. 76322156 three judges concurred in finding that term was the name of the goods

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

BALDWIN, Judge,

concurring.

I agree with both the analysis and result reached in the majority opinion and accordingly join therewith.

It appears to me that the mark for which registration is sought not only describes the purpose and function of appellant’s goods, but is also the name of the goods.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.