Opinion
The opinion
Chief Judge VAUGHN
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I do not believe that the facts found are sufficient to allow meaningful appellate review of the judge’s decision to deprive the mother of custody of the eight-year-old son and to separate that child from his brother. I vote to reverse and remand the case on the custody question.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.
A word about cookies
We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.