Opinion

Carter v. Mandel

  • 573 F.2d 172
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Mar 21, 1978
Status
Published
On the bench
Butzner, Hall, Haynsworth
Cited by
6 cases
Authority
More cited than 78.0%

legal assistance provided for Maryland prisoners “was constitutionally sufficient” even though “[t]he state ha[d] not established prison law libraries” because the state “operate[d] a public defender program”

How later courts described this case

  • legal assistance provided for Maryland prisoners “was constitutionally sufficient” even though “[t]he state ha[d] not established prison law libraries” because the state “operate[d] a public defender program”
  • no right to law library unless case rejected by the program or program is inadequate

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

PER CURIAM:

This action was brought to challenge the adequacy of the legal assistance available to Maryland prisoners. The state has not established prison law libraries, but it operates a public defender program. The district court’s opinion carefully analyzes the prisoners’ needs and the public and private assistance that is available. See, Hall v. State of Maryland, 433 F.Supp. 756 (D.Md. 1977).

Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817 , 97 S.Ct. 1491 , 52 L.Ed.2d 72 (1977), decided after this case was tried, holds that failure to provide prisoners with adequate law libraries or assistance from legally trained per *173 sons violates their constitutional right of access to the courts. With one exception, the district court correctly anticipated the Supreme Court’s ruling. Bounds indicates that the constitutional right of access to the courts extends to federal civil rights claims. 430 U.S. at 827, 828, n.17 , 97 S.Ct. 1491 . Because the district court concluded that Maryland has no constitutional obligation to provide assistance in federal civil rights cases, 433 F.Supp. at 779-80 , that aspect of the case must be remanded for reconsideration in light of Bounds .

The district court found that the legal assistance provided for all other types of litigation was constitutionally sufficient. With respect to these, we affirm. Although litigation is not static and the future may require changes, the record establishes that Maryland has commendably recognized its constitutional obligation to provide legal assistance for its prisoners.

Affirmed in part.

Vacated in part and Remanded.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.