The opinion
Judge WEBB
dissenting.
I dissent from the majority. I believe that under the holding of Smith Co. v. Highway Comm., 279 N.C. 328 , 182 S.E. 2d 383 (1971), the defendants’ access to the street has been injured for which they are entitled to compensation. I do not believe that the fact that commercial property was involved in Smith is a distinction which should make a difference. I vote to reverse.