Opinion

United States v. California

  • 558 F.2d 1347
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Apr 1, 1977
Status
Published
Author
Wallace
On the bench
Carter, Duniway, Wallace
Cited by
8 cases
Authority
More cited than 18.9%

Reversed by California v. United States, 438 U.S. 645 (1978)

noting on rehearing that "we overlooked" an argument made "in [the] briefs on appeal"

How later courts described this case

  • noting on rehearing that "we overlooked" an argument made "in [the] briefs on appeal"

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

WALLACE, Circuit Judge,

concurring in part:

I concur in part. Concluding that the first of Judge Duniway’s reasons to deny the petition is more than adequate (“the assignment was of an application, not of a permit containing conditions”), I would not reach the constitutional issue. See Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 297 U.S. 288, 341 , 56 S.Ct. 466 , 80 L.Ed. 688 (1936) (Brandéis, J., concurring).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.