finding that the plaintiffs allegations were too vague and eonclusory to constitute “the type of overt act necessary to establish racial discrimination as barred by the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
How later courts described this case
- finding that the plaintiffs allegations were too vague and eonclusory to constitute “the type of overt act necessary to establish racial discrimination as barred by the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
On Application for Rehearing
PER CURIAM:
Defendants have applied for a rehearing in this case, decided by this court on June 17,1965, 347 F.2d 86 .
The rehearing is granted and the decision of the court is modified to provide that no costs shall be taxed on this appeal.