Opinion

Lostutter v. Brown Shoe Co.

  • 203 Ill. App. 517
  • 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 1084
Court
Appellate Court of Illinois
Filed
Oct 12, 1916
Status
Published
Author
Carnes
On the bench
Carnes, Niehaus, Pbesiding
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.5%

The opinion

Mr. Justice Carnes dissenting. The only case directly in point that has come to my attention is Foth v. Macomber & Whyte Rope Co., 161 Wis. 549 . The conclusion of that court that their Workmen’s Compensation Act applied in a similar case under similar statutes is not based on the repeal of one of the statutes. I do not understand that a question of the repeal of our Child Labor Act is involved in this case. I am of the opinion that in the absence of other direct authority we should follow the reasoning of the Wisconsin case and affirm the judgment and permit the parties to obtain the decision of the 'Supreme Court on the controlling question, which is one of great general importance, without incurring the necessary expense and delay of a jury trial.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.