Opinion

Skilbeck v. Andreasen

  • 186 Ill. App. 368
Court
Appellate Court of Illinois
Filed
Apr 15, 1914
Status
Published
Author
Dibell
On the bench
Dibell
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Mr. Justice Dibell delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Appeal and ebbob, § 472 * —necessity of preserving objection to questions asked of witness by court. Though section 81 of the Practice Act, as amended in 1911, J & A. ¶ 8618, does away with the necessity for preserving an exception, it is still the law that counsel considering themselves injured by question asked of a witness by the court must object thereto and give the trial judge an opportunity to withdraw the objectionable question. Whitney, J., took no part in this decision.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.