Opinion

Peters v. Schoenhaus

  • 89 F.R.D. 517
  • 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11600
Court
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Filed
Jan 28, 1981
Status
Published
Author
Giles
On the bench
Giles
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GILES, District Judge.

The trial in this case resulted in a jury verdict on December 18, 1980, in favor of defendants and against plaintiffs. Judgment was entered the following day. On December 29, 1980, plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial. I denied the motion without prejudice for failure to comply with E.D.Pa.R.Civ.Pro. 20(d). Order dated January 9, 1981 ¶ 1 [hereinafter cited as Order]. Within the time which I allotted for refiling (seven days), plaintiff renewed the motion. Again counsel failed to comply with E.D.Pa.R.Civ.Pro. 20(d).

Rule 20(d) provides that:

“Every motion not certified as uncontested shall be accompanied by a written statement as to the date and manner of service of the motion and supporting brief.”

The rule has two purposes. Because the deadline for opposition to a motion depends on the time and manner of service, see E.D.Pa.R.Civ.Pro. 20(c); Bagley v. Little, Brown & Co., No. 79-2858, slip op. at 1-2 (E.D.Pa. Sept. 10, 1980) (order vacating award of attorney fees), the statement of service permits opposing parties and court to calculate when a response is due, and when a motion may be treated as uncontested. The statement also fulfills a more basic purpose. It gives some assurance to the court that opposing counsel have indeed been served, and that any action taken on the motion will not be ex parte.

An additional problem with the instant motion is that it disregards not merely the local rule, but also a court order pointing out the defect and requiring full compliance with the rules. Order, supra, ¶ 4. Finally, another refiling necessarily would occur more than ten (10) days after entry of the verdict, thus tampering with the spirit if not the letter of Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 6(b) and 59(b). See generally, 6A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 59.09[1], at 59-199 to 202 (1979); 11 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure Civil § 2812 (1973).

I shall deny the motion without prejudice. However, any renewed motion must be filed within seven (7) days after entry of this order and must fully comply with the federal and local rules, or it shall be dismissed with prejudice.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.