Opinion

Merchants' Stock & Grain Co. v. Board of Trade of Chicago

  • 201 F. 20
  • 120 C.C.A. 582
  • 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1988
Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Filed
Oct 24, 1912
Status
Published
Author
Hook
On the bench
Hook, Smith
Cited by
53 cases
Authority
More cited than 16.7%

“there is no power in any except the court against which the contempt is committed to punish it [and] such court has exclusive jurisdiction"

How later courts described this case

  • “there is no power in any except the court against which the contempt is committed to punish it [and] such court has exclusive jurisdiction"

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

HOOK, Circuit Judge.

I concur in the foregoing opinion, excepting that part in which it is said that probably a defendant in a charge of criminal contempt may be compelled to testify and incriminate himself. The question is not involved in the case before us and a different view was expressed, at least arguendo, in Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co., 221 U. S. 418, 444 , 31 Sup. Ct. 492, 55 L. Ed. 797 , 34 L. R. A. (N. S.) 874.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.