Opinion

American Communications Ass'n C. I. O. v. Schauffler

  • 80 F. Supp. 400
  • 22 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2261
  • 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2104
Court
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Filed
Jun 21, 1948
Status
Published
Author
Bard
On the bench
Bard, Ganey, Kalodner, Ney
Cited by
7 cases

The opinion

BARD, District Judge

(dissenting).

I dissent from the view of the majority that the members of the Board are indispensable parties, warranting dismissal of the complaint.

I would, however, deny the prayer for injunctive relief for, as explained by the majority, plaintiffs have failed to comply with subsections (f) and (g).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.