Opinion

Jimenez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

678 F. App'x 181

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed: Mar 9, 2017
Status: Published
On the bench: Davis, Harris, Thacker
Cited by: 0 cases

The opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clotilde C. Jimenez appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jimenez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 1:16-cv-00624-CMH-MSN, 2016 WL 4059161 (E.D. Va. filed July 26, 2016; entered July 27, 2016). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.