with pro se motion, Rule 59(e)’s 28-day deadline cannot be extended and three-day extension under Rule 6(d)—i.e. additional time for mail service—does not apply
How later courts described this case
- with pro se motion, Rule 59(e)’s 28-day deadline cannot be extended and three-day extension under Rule 6(d)—i.e. additional time for mail service—does not apply
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dardrie Rozzelle appeals the district court’s order denying her postjudgment motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rozzelle v. Univ. of N.C., No. 3:15-cv-00050-MOC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Dec. 7, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.