Opinion

Roberts v. Pruitt

  • 591 F. App'x 201
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jan 27, 2015
Status
Published
On the bench
Diaz, Keenan, Shedd
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Aaron B. Roberts appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for appointment of counsel and granting Defendants summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action against them. Roberts has also filed a motion for appointment of counsel on appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Roberts’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s order. Roberts v. Pruitt, No. 1:13-cv-03604-GLR, 2014 WL 4182215 (D.Md. Aug. 20, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.