Opinion

Kane v. UPS Pension Plan Board of Trustees

  • 584 F. App'x 109
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Oct 1, 2014
Status
Published
On the bench
Diaz, Shedd, Wynn
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 14.0%

The opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Kane appeals from the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to Appellee and denying Kane’s motion to reinstate a claim. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kane v. UPS Pension Plan, No. 1:11-cv-03719-RDB (D. Md. Oct. 23 & Dec. 11, 2013). In addition, we note that Kane raised certain claims regarding his motion to reinstate for the first time in his reply brief. We find these claims waived. Equal Rights Ctr. v. Niles Bolton Assocs., 602 F.3d 597 , 604 n. 4 (4th Cir.2010) (holding that argument not raised in opening brief is waived). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.