Opinion

Shamberger v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

567 F. App'x 183

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed: Apr 21, 2014
Status: Published
On the bench: Duncan, King, Wilkinson
Cited by: 0 cases

The opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Keith B. Shamberger appeals the district court’s order dismissing his pro se complaint against Defendants after a review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Shamberger v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 3:13-cv-00645-JAG, 2013 WL 6019248 (E.D.Va. Nov. 13, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.