Opinion

Huffman v. State Board of Control

  • 3 Ct. Cl. 99
Court
West Virginia Court of Claims
Filed
Aug 29, 1945
Status
Published
Author
Schuck
On the bench
Bland, File, Forth, Junc, Kunst, Robert, Schucic, Schuck, Views
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

CHARLES J. SCHUCK, JUDGE,

upoir petition for rehearing.

A rehearing having been heretofore granted the claimant in re the above claim, and all of the facts adduced in the first or original hearing, as well as those presented at the second hearing, having been duly considered, and Judge Smith, sitting for the first time at the regular October term, 1945, agreeing with the views set forth in my dissenting opinion heretofore filed, and in which an award was recommended, and for the reasons set forth in the said opinion, an award is now made to the claimant in the sum of three thousand dollars ($3000.00) ; the said dissenting opinion hereby being adopted as the majority opinion of the court in the matter of said award; and we further recommend that payment be made accordingly in the said sum to the proper guardian duly appointed and qualified to care for the said infant’s affairs and interests.

Judge Bland dissents and will file an opinion setting forth his views.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.