Opinion

United States v. English

  • 332 F. App'x 850
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Sep 14, 2009
Status
Published
On the bench
Agee, Duncan, King
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Harold English appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. English, No. 3:95-cr-00068-MJP (D.S.C. Aug. 22, 2008). We deny English’s motions for appointment of counsel, for leave to file a supplemental brief, and to place his appeal in abeyance. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.