Opinion

Lloyd v. Jordan

  • 326 F. App'x 225
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
May 29, 2009
Status
Published
On the bench
Agee, Motz, Traxler
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Annis Recardo Lloyd appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action alleging violation of his constitutional rights. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lloyd v. Jordan, No. 5:08-ct-03143-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 22, 2009).

We deny Lloyd’s motion for injunctive relief and motion to compel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented *226 in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.