Opinion

Cetina v. Michelin North America

  • 539 F. App'x 294
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Sep 26, 2013
Status
Published
On the bench
Hamilton, Niemeyer, Thacker
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 10.4%

The opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tanya Lynn Cetina seeks to appeal the district court’s orders adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss her claims against Defendants Dave Mau-ger and Michelin North America, Incorporated. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 , 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Because Cetina’s claims against several other Defendants remain, the orders Cetina seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.