Opinion

Cannon v. Longo

435 F. App'x 290

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed: Jun 21, 2011
Status: Published
On the bench: Gregory, Hamilton, Niemeyer
Cited by: 0 cases

The opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carlos Cannon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Cannon’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cannon v. Longo, No. JFM-10-1089, 2011 WL 709847 (D.Md. Feb. 22, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.